Translate

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

The Anti-Mosque Brigades.

.


A Muslim group recently applied to renovate a building they own and operate in lower Manhattan, New York City. They want to add a cultural center type of facility, and say that they plan to try to promote peace and understanding among all the faiths. I don't know -- that sounds to me like a good idea. As I understand it, they are building a "community center," not a mosque. But what if they wanted to build a mosque? Is there something bad about that? I've seen pictures of some mosques from around the world, and many of them are beautiful. So what's the problem, exactly?


Abe Foxman is the head of an organization grossly misnamed the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) which, oddly enough, devotes its ample resources to defaming other groups, as well as chicken-little reporting designed to convince their donors that the nazis are coming. Good business there. ADL reports $200 Million in assets, raised $90 million in their last reporting year of 2007, and pays Abe about $300,000/year. http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=10657-- Abe Foxman decided that he would use the proposal to renovate the mosque to Fundraise! Yeah! Just like the Mormons used gay marriage in California to recruit members and fundraise! Just like the Republican Teabaggers use racism to recruit members and fundraise. What do they share in common? The same slogan: We're Bigots. Join Us.

Here's a funny quote from the Anti-Defamation League's website: "Now the nation's premier civil rights/human relations agency, ADL fights anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry, defends democratic ideals and protects civil rights for all." Maybe they should put a few asterisks at the end of that sentence: ***(we defend civil rights for everyone except for the Muslims).


The bigots in New York City demanded that the city refuse to allow the Muslim mosque or other religious facility to be constructed. They urged the government to refuse to grant the building permit. They even asked a city board to designate the existing building as a historical landmark to tie up any proposed construction with the nuances of renovating such buildings. The arguments raised by the unruly mob opposing the mosque included: (1) we don't need more religious buildings downtown; (2) it's insensitive to build "so near" the former World Trade Center because "they" (all Muslims, apparently) attacked "us"; (3) Islam is a violent religion, so our government should forbid them from operating anywhere in our country; or (4) just because. All arguments an absurd cover for the central unifying concept: We're Bigots. Join Us.

It does not matter what the Koran says, or whether anybody likes Muslims. Just does not matter in our legal system, period. Completely irrelevant. Our law prohibits the government from favoring or supporting one religion, or disfavoring or banishing another. Our law simply requires the government to stay out of it. If the zoning laws in a city allow religious structures to be built in a certain neighborhood, that is the beginning and end of the inquiry as far as government involvement. If the structure otherwise complies with height restrictions, architectural requirements, health and safety code (fire sprinklers), set-backs, the structure can be built.


I love the arguments about Muslims being violent. I would suggest a quick look at history would prove Christians to be the most violent religious group ever. But beyond that, if we want to narrow the field, our best position would be to acknowledge that white men are violent, and lock them all in prison until they are at least 70 years of age. Most violence in this country is done by white men, so if we are motivated to protect the citizens from violence, let's lock up the white men and start there. No? No takers? Is it possible that's because white men run everything? So it's easier to target Muslims, because they have no power in this country? What a bunch of cowards. As well as ignorant bigots. And hey, I don't like any religion, so it's not like I'm pro-Muslim. I'm just anti-Bigot.


Further, people who hate Muslims and claim they are responsible for all the evil in the world are just trying to distract Americans from the truth. The truth is that the men on Wall Street have caused most of the suffering in the world. They have worked together, plotting, paid bribes to politicians to corrupt all government, they pollute the water and earth, they manipulate markets, they try to steal all the resources of the world, they embellish themselves and their despicable spouses and useless spawn in gold and rare gems while children throughout the world starve as a result of their conduct. so please spare me the lectures about how bad the Muslims are. The most evil, despicable, murderous group of people in the entire world is sitting right down on Wall Street continuing their looting and pillaging. Anybody wants to picket somebody, go picket them, to get the big boys. Not some little mosque where religious people go to pray. Go to Wall Street where the people worship one thing, money, and will kill anyone just to get more of it for themselves.


One of my favorite performers is Yusuf Islam, formerly known as Cat Stevens. He is a Muslim. He wrote and performed "Peace Train," one of the greatest anti-war, anti-violence peace songs of all times. Unlike Lloyd F-ing Blankfein, and all his co-conspirators at Goldman-Sux who have never contributed one thing of value to the world because they are too busy destroying it. So who's violent? Who should be driven out of our country? I vote for the men on Wall Street.

Why Do We Need Net Neutrality?

.


Google and Verizon control access to the internet. They want to use their monopoly control of access to the internet to make even more money for themselves. Here's what they want to do: sell the right to dictate the content on the internet to the highest bidder. If Rupert Murdoch and Fox are willing to pay, they will take over the internet, and the only information reasonably available will be the garbage and right-wing lies that they select.

Here's how it is going to work. Google and Verizon, and anyone else selling access to the internet to the public, will also offer major media groups the right to have top billing, so to speak. Rupert Murdoch and Fox will pay whatever money is charged to get the top billing. Then whenever any American tries to do a search online, all they will get are links to Fox News reports, meaning links to articles that are false, racist, right-wing, and stupid.

Try to find any real information on a subject, and you will end up having to scroll through multiple pages just to get a link to a reputable source. Now maybe adults can figure out how to find better sources of information. But think about the kids. Most schools now have kids using computers. What happens if the only information they get about history, for example, are the false and grossly ludicrous rantings of somebody like that sexual deviant and pervert O'Reilly, or the weeping catholic-mormon alcoholic Glenn Beck? An entire nation of idiot children believing what these men say is true. It sounds like Adolph Hitler's dream.

Fox is owned by Murdoch (an Australian) and a Saudi prince. Why should they own any news source in this country? Just to start, we should go back to our former laws which prohibited foreign ownership of the media. I think Murdoch unfortunately may be a citizen by now, but he still should be limited to owning one newspaper period -- not one per city, but one period. One TV station, nothing more. Go back to mandating broad ownership of the media to provide broad sources of information.

And ask yourself this question: what is Saudi Arabia, and why would a "prince" want to own and control the media of the U.S.? Saudi Arabia is a small nation in the middle east that has an enormous amount of oil in their ground. A small gang of murderers and thieves who call themselves the "Saudi Royal Family" have used war and and ongoing despotic dictatorship marked by extremely brutality towards their own people to steal most of the nation's money for themselves. Among other things, they have signed agreements to let U.S. and western oil corporations control all of the oil, take it from the country, and pay a percentage of sales to the Saudi Royal Family. The resources of the nation, in other words, are not used for the benefit of the people -- they are stolen by western corporations, with the small controlling gang taking most of the money from the sale. They don't even allow their own people to work in the oil industry because they know that if their people learned how to run it, they would throw out the westerners and take control for themselves.

So why would a Saudi prince want to own and control the media in the U.S.? First, the U.S. provides military protection to the criminal gang known as the Saudi Royal Family. We use our force to keep them in power because our corporations profit from the existing system that lets them steal all the oil. Second, the last thing that Saudi Arabia wants is for Americans to learn that the earth is in danger, that we must immediately develop and invest in green technology and stop using oil. If the U.S. stopped using oil, the Saudi Royal Family would not be able to keep selling their country's oil for so much money. So Saudi Arabia, along with Murdoch, uses the Fox media to lie to the U.S. public and tell them that there is no global warming, no climate change, no reason to stop using oil. They are working together to kill us all.

Google, Verizon and Fox are all monopolies, and should be busted up because they violate our laws of anti-trust. Who is supposed to stop predator corporations that use unfair business practices to eliminate competition and take control of the market? The federal government. The attorney general, to be specific, is charged with the responsibility to enforce the anti-trust laws of our nation. So why isn't our attorney general doing anything about it? We need to demand that our government enforce the antitrust laws and bust up these corporate predators, force them to sell off most of their holdings, and stop them from having such broad control in our lives, because all they do is promote fascism (corporate control of the nation).

We have Democratic control of Congress, and a Democrat in the white house. Why should we, the citizens, have to struggle for something as simple as having access to a variety of news sources and information? It seems more and more like we only get the "official" story dictated by right-wing fascists like Murdoch and his mercenaries. Why don't our Democrats do something to help us? They have the votes, they have the power. No spine, once again, they'd rather take bribes from corporations like Fox than actually do their job, which is to help the people of this country. Tell the Democrats to protect net neutrality and enforce the anti-trust laws to bust up Google, Verizon, Murdoch and Fox.

Monday, August 9, 2010

The WTO: A Trojan Horse Corporate Front Group For U.S. Corporations.

.
The WTO: A Trojan Horse Corporate Front Group For U.S. Corporations

How is it possible that Dow is up, the criminals on Wall Street have to bring dump trucks to their back doors to haul out the hundreds of millions of dollars of our money that they pay themselves as "bonuses," yet we have at least 20% unemployment and most Americans are flat broke and busted? It's all according to plan.

Here's how it worked.

The major U.S.-based corporations, businesses that got rich because of the sweat and ingenuity of American workers, began to move into other countries, other markets, trying to use their wealth to take over more of the world. But many nations had tariffs to protect their own local businesses, and prevent U.S. predator corporations from coming in, dumping their products into other countries' markets at radical discounts, and forcing local businesses to shut down. Once there was no other competition, the U.S. predator corporations jacked up the prices and robbed people blind.

A group of wealthy people from major corporations got together to create a Trojan Horse which they named the World Trade Organization ("WTO"). They hired slick PR companies to write up fictional stories about how "World" trade would make us all rich, we would all have good jobs, all have money to invest in the stock market. We would eliminate hunger, provide healthcare and housing for all through international cooperation and innovation. Ah yes, it would be paradise, or that's what they told us. And they came up with phony names to cover up what they were doing. They called it "Globalization," which has such a nice sound. They should have called it "Global Rape," because that's what it is.

The WTO has two direct financial co-conspirators, the World Bank (WB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The WTO would go into a country, offer to "help" the politicians make a better nation such as by building water systems for home-delivery of water and to irrigate crops. They would help to build roads, do flood control. All would be provided with loans from the IMF and the WB. Eventually the borrower nation would default because of a disaster, or crop failure, or war, or the politicians would steal too much of the money to complete the projects, and then the WTO would "foreclose" on the whole country. The WTO, remember, is just a shell, like a Trojan Horse, and the real interested parties are major U.S. corporations. So the WTO would go into the foreclosed nation and steal everything, like locusts. They would tell the government that the people must stop using their fields to grow food to feed themselves, and instead must grow some luxury item to export to Europe. They would tell the government that it must pay back the money borrowed from the WB and IMF, which means they would have to shut down their schools and hospitals, shut down the bus system, stop paying the pensions of government workers, shut down the community-kitchens run across the country to prevent starvation. So what if people starve? Lloyd F-ing Blankfein, the head of Goldeman-Sux, wants his money. So the people die.

Gradually, the WTO has taken over most of the world, even the U.S. The only laws in most countries are those written by the WTO. They hand stacks of papers to the government, including to our congress, and tell them "Here is the new law for 'financial non-reform.' Pass it." And congress does it because they get bribes and kick-backs. All countries do it because they are coerced, they have no money, they have no choice. But if any country resists the demands of the WTO, then the WTO and the U.S. corporations simply go to the U.S. government and instruct it to declare war against the nation that refuses to submit to the WTO. That is exactly what happened in Afghanistan and Iraq. In Afghanistan, representatives of the U.S. government and the U.S. oil corporations offered millions of dollars to the Taliban if they would agree to let the U.S. corporations take the oil and gas from Afghanistan. The Taliban refused and, within a few months, surprise surprise, bush-cheney claimed that we had been attacked by Afghanistan even though we were attacked by Saudi Arabia. So our troops invaded and continue to occupy that nation and kill its people. And the U.S. oil corporations are firmly in place with authority to go ahead and steal all the resources from that country.

In the U.S., the WTO and the U.S. corporations bribed the politicians to start adopting WTO laws as our own, including signing binding treaties which would devastated the people of this country, such as Nafta. Clinton and Rubin worked together to eliminate laws regulating Wall Street, because that's what the WTO did, and Lloyd F-ing Blankfein and all the other Scum from Wall Street immediately set out on a mission to steal every single thing in this country of any value. Our government did nothing to stop them, and even today refuses to lift a hand to punish these predators and get our money back.

The U.S. corporations decided that once the WTO took control of other countries, the U.S. corporations would move their businesses to third world nations where they can dump poison into the land, spew it into the air, kill their workers, pay slave wages, hire child labor, and make even more money for people like Lloyd F-ing Blankfein and Goldman-Sux. And that's what they've done. To the extent possible, they just keep moving the jobs out of this country, and Wall Street just keeps making more and more money. Americans are unemployed and broke, and Wall Street stole all our money.

Wall Street is a criminal enterprise and its leaders need to be indicted, their assets seized and used for the public good, and their employees put into prison for life.

I read an interesting article this morning about Goldman-Sux and Wall Street, and how they never stop trying to create phony asset bubbles, cheat the public, and steal more money. They even do it under the guise of being "philanthropists." Don't believe it for a second. Here's what they've done in the world of "Art." Wall Street has created an asset bubble in the world of Art by manipulating the market, using insider information, and defrauding the public. Just like they do every day in every area of their business lives.

The Wall Street scum pay somebody in a big museum a bundle of money (which they write off) and buy themselves a spot on the Board of Directors. At the same time, the Wall Street Scum buy up certain art. Say, for example, they decide they want to run up the price of Hopper. They buy up some Hopper paintings. Then they use their position on the Board to get the museum to buy lots of Hopper, have special exhibitions of Hopper, tell the entire world that Hopper is the most brilliant artist, a must-have for the private collector. The price of anything by Hopper goes up ten fold, the Wall Street scumbuckets sell their Hopper that they bought for $2.0 million for $20.0 million and make an obscene return, and the public once again gets bilked when Wall Street moves on to the next artist, and declares that Hopper is, after all, a "lesser" talent. These guys should not be trusted around the collection plate in church, that's how big of thieves they are.

Wall Street is like the Mafia, except more ruthless, brutal, and deadly. They are predators. They have no loyalty to this country or to any of the people in it. They would be thrilled to take all their money to some other nation and live there, laughing all the way to the Hedge Fund. These people should be in prison. When will the Obama administration stand up and do what is right? And if they don't, how long will the citizens of this country sit here and let these scumbuckets on Wall Street continue to steal everything, make our kids slaves, destroy our future?

65 Years After The U.S. Dropped Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki, We're Still Out Waging Wars And Slaughtering People.

.

On August 6, 1945, during World War II, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The bomb was named Little Boy, dropped from an airplane named the Enola Gay.  Little Boy killed 140,000 Japanese, destroyed the city, and seriously injured another 100,000 residents.

On August 9, 1945, the United States dropped a second atomic bomb on Japan, this one on the city named Nagasaki. That bomb was named Fatman. It killed 74,000, seriously injured 75,000, and destroyed the city.

The death and devastation caused by those two bombs haunted the world for generations, showing the horrors of war, the suffering that could be inflicted by humans on each other, the need to avoid nuclear weapons proliferation and to avoid wars.


But those lessons were forgotten or ignored by greedy sociopathic men like bush-cheney and those who put them into office. So once again, the United States is leading the world in its atrocities against other nations. There are arguments that the atomic bombs were necessary because Japan refused to surrender, and so many Americans would have died tried to invade that nation. Some people argue that the bombs were not necessary. I don't have an answer. I do know that the bombing of the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki caused all people in the world to stop, to back away from war, to think about the consequences of mass murder, which is all that war is.
We have outdone ourselves in the U.S. Wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. Neither nation declared war on us. Neither nation attacked us, or threatened to attack us. Neither nation had much of a military, if any, just poor men with hand-held guns, trying to stop the most sophisticated military in the world from taking over their countries. Why are we really there, other than to act as a private security goon squad for the oil corporations that want to steal the oil? No other reason.

The U.S. government has refused to allow the citizens of the U.S. to know critical information about these wars. Why do they refuse to let the citizens be informed about what is going on? Because they learned from Vietnam that if the citizens really know and see what is being done in their names, they will quickly turn against the wars.


Our government, for example, recently refused to allow the Rolling Stone reporter who interviewed former General McChrystal to go to Iraq as part of a media team. It's straight-up censorship and a first amendment violation to exclude the reporter who everyone admits told the truth, and only allow in the reporters who parrot the government's lies. It's our first amendment -- the people's constitutional rights --to have access to accurate media reporting about what our government is doing. By excluding this reporter, the government has violated the constitutional rights of all the people.

The government has also banned and censored photos -- such as no photos of Americans coming back from war in coffins are allowed to be taken by anyone, because the public during Vietnam was horrified at the sight of the coffins filled with young Americans, dead for no good reason. Photos convey the truth, and the government is trying to prevent the public from learning the truth.


Our government also refuses to allow any counting of the number of people we have killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. That is intended to cover up and avoid claims of international war crimes (which we have committed) and to keep the public ignorant about the slaughter that is going on in their names. Despite the government's efforts to prevent this from coming out, authoritative sources have done their best to estimate the total number of dead. They have concluded that at a minimum, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died because of the U.S. War Against Iraq, and possibly well over One Million people have died. We've exceeded anyone's wildest nightmares, and have killed way more than we did in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. No celebration is in order. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/how-many-iraqis-did-we-li_b_673683.html

(Firestorm wiped out everything still existing in Hiroshima after the bomb was dropped)
The website Cost Of War keeps a running tab on the cost to the U.S. of the bush-cheney corporate resource wars being waged against Iraq and Afghanistan. Currently, that cost is over One Trillion Dollars. Who profits? Oil corporations, the World Trade Organization which established its control over the occupied nations and their resources by use of brutality and violence, Blackwater, Halliburton, Dick Cheney and his evil spawn, Wall Street, the defense industry. Who loses? The people of Iraq and Afghanistan whose nations have been destroyed and are being militarily occupied and stripped of their resources, and the people of the U.S.

If you want to know why our nation is bankrupt, look to these wars of aggression for a big part of the answer. One Trillion Dollars of taxpayer money spent on these wars, and now our government has the nerve to tell us that they have wiped out the Social Security fund, and they want to change the law so that nobody can collect until they are at least 70 years old. They've stolen our money. We need to go get it back. We need to end these wars, have public hearings to hold the people who lied us into these wars responsible for their actions. We need an accounting of what they have done with our money, because apparently hundreds of millions of dollars have simply been stolen. And we need to make sure that our country will never again go to war unless another nation has attacked us, or there is evidence of imminent threat of attack.
http://costofwar.com/



Cold Avocado Soup (Zabars Recipe)

.


Avocado in Vegetable Consomme
by Chef Boris

Ingredients
1.5 Quarts Zabar's vegetable consommé (vegetable stock or chicken stock could be used)
2 Avocados, medium dice
2 Avocado, mashed
5 Kirby Cucumbers, quartered and thinly sliced
1 bunch Scallions, whites and greens thinly sliced
1/2 cup Sweet Gherkins, finely sliced
1 Tbsp Mild Hot Sauce
2 Tbsp Lemon Juice
Salt to taste

Preparation
Prepare all ingredients and gently mix in large bowl, seasoning with the salt to taste.

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Ghost Dancing With Lady Gaga.

.


If you want to destroy a nation and enslave its people, you must first destroy their culture, erase all evidence of their history. That's why the accomplishments of women and minorities in the U.S. have never been included in our history books, never taught to the children: their history has been eradicted to keep women and minorities demoralized, weak, enslaved.

When Spain decided to invade and take control of California from their bases in occupied Mexico, they found land belonging to native Americans. Spain had the weapons and trained military so could fight when necessary, but their real weapon was the Catholic Church and its dogma. They set up missions up and down the coast of California in one of the first "Hearts and Mind" military occupations in the new world. Well yes, they admit, they did kill a lot of people, but they also tried to "help" the people. For example, they gave them a place to live -- imprisoned within the mission system, enslaved to the church. They tried to help the children -- by beating them into renouncing their own culture and belief system, and proclaiming adherence to the Catholic doctrine as a condition to the right to live. Invade, slaughter, indoctrinate, destroy the local culture, force them to give at least lip service to your dogma. Spreading freedom throughout the world. Along with smallpox and other western diseases that wiped out up to 90% of some native American communities. Dominus Vobiscum.


If you really want to own people, you have to strip them of everything they have. And the most important thing they have is their history, their culture, and their beliefs. The European settlors, invaders of the land later called the U.S., began stealing Native American land as soon as they got here, and kept it up all the way to the west coast. Eventually the U.S. came up with lofty theories to claim that they were destined by God to engage in this slaughter, reducing the Native American population from an estimated 18 million pre-Columbus down to a few hundred thousand. By 1830, the U.S. government had passed a law called the Indian Removal Act which required all Native Americans be either killed or moved to desolate barren land and confined in concentration camps.

"By 1872, the U.S. Army pursued a policy to exterminate all Native Americans unless or until they agreed to surrender and live on reservations 'where they could be taught Christianity and agriculture.' The Indian [was thought] as less than human and worthy only of extermination. We did shoot down defenseless men, and women and children at places like Camp Grant, Sand Creek, and Wounded Knee. We did feed strychnine to red warriors. We did set whole villages of people out naked to freeze in the iron cold of Montana winters. And we did confine thousands in what amounted to concentration camps."
—The Indian Wars of the West, 1934
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Americans_in_the_United_States

So every decade or so our nation just takes out the same old fairy tale, dusts it off, and begins the extermination of another group of people. Like now, in the middle east, where we will kill all the people unless they agree to allow our country to occupy and control them while western corporations strip them of all their resources. And oh yes -- we also are there to teach those people "christianity," just like we did to the Native Americans.

As Native Americans from across the country were exterminated, and the last survivors in the west rounded up and sent on forced marches that make the Turks' treatment of the Armenians look like line dancing, the surviving Native Americans, weakened and in despair, turned to fantasy in their last pathetic hope to be saved. They turned to the Ghost Dance. The idea of the Ghost Dance spread among the survivors, and was fanatically embraced by these poor people as their communities were destroyed. The belief was that if enough of them engaged in the Ghost Dance, it would make all the white people disappear. The white people were really spooked by the dance, so they declared it illegal: No dance, no culture, no history, no belief other than that of the occupying force. When the people persisted in the Ghost Dance, they were slaughtered.


In Wounded Knee, 153 native Americans were slaughtered, many of them women and children. Resistance is futile. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_Dance


When the U.S. military invaded Iraq the most recent time, the occupying forces were told that they should do nothing to stop the looters (American?) who were emptying out Iraq's museums of all their national treasures. Iraq is sometimes called the Birthplace of Civilization (and its neighbor Afghanistan is called the Graveyard of Empires). Their antiquities contain much evidence of what really happened thousands of years ago, evidence which could undermine the Judeo-Christian claims about their version of history. The National Museum of Iraq includes antiquities that are almost Three Thousand Years Old. They were up, running, keeping records, long before Jesus. Imagine what invaluable, irreplaceable information was stored in that precious museum, before the Americans allowed if not directed that it be looted, the history and culture of Iraq, preserved for thousands of years, stolen and undoubtedly hidden away now in the secret rooms of many of the Wall Street Scum who profit from these wars. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/24/world/middleeast/24museum.html

The Iraq National Museum was partly re-opened for the dignitaries, but most of its antiquities are gone. Probably stolen, much of it destroyed. The history and culture of the people of Iraq has been deliberately erased by the U.S. It isn't war as we think of it. It wasn't really to remove Saddam Hussein. The purpose of the U.S. War Against Iraq is to destroy the nation of Iraq, turn it over to an outpost for the western corporations and their goon squad and muscle provided by the U.S. military and by private mercenary assassin groups like Blackwater. This ain't your mama's war. Destruction of the nation was not an accidental byproduct of a battle -- it was the purpose all along.

(Iraqi citizens,standing outside the museum fence and watching the dignitaries parade through).

Why destroy the country? Among other things, the U.S. has built 8 permanent military bases and a Billion Dollar Embassy there. Do you think that's for future tea parties for the neighbors? No. We plan to stay there until the oil is gone, which is estimated to be about 35 years.

There are other reasons that the U.S. (and its pitbull Israel) are trying to take control of much of the middle east, which is to grab antiquities so they can continue to lie to the world about what "really" happened in history. "Their" version of history, of course, is that set forth in the Bible. But other people, and other nations, have entirely different books, different national stories about history, some of which contradict the Judeo-Christian version.

Why does the Bible still control the "official" version of history? One reason is because so many other nations are invaded, attacked, their history and culture destroyed, their writings stolen or eradicated. Why does Israel really want to control all of Jerusalem? Is it possible that there are artifacts there that completely undermine Israel's version of history? Of course so, and in fact many antiquities have been unearthed in recent years that contradict the Jewish and Christian versions of "history." Why destroy conflicting evidence? Because we like having the "official" version say that we, the Christians and the Jews, should be in charge. God says we're in charge.

For example, what if the Red Sea did not part, what if Moses did not lead slaves through the sea with the Egyptians in hot pursuit. If that is not true, then pretty much the whole story about God promising all that land to the Jews really falls apart. Imagine the turmoil throughout the world of Christianity if it was discovered that Jesus did not die on the cross, did not arise from his tomb and go directly to heaven, but instead lived for decades. Him, the Mrs., the kids. Think of all the wealth that has been collected by Bible-based religions for the past 2000 years, and imagine what would happen to them if it turned out that much of the story was disproved in writing, by evidence discovered in the region.

Hiding or destroying history can be just as valuable as writing it, claiming "the" definitive version of "what really happened." Look at who wrote the history books, and you can bet those people have skewed the story to benefit themselves.

When the U.S. military invaded Iraq, they were given explicit instructions that they should do nothing to interfere with the looting and destruction of Iraq's national treasures, undisputable evidence in antiquities about what really happened in history, invaluable and irreplaceable evidence of the history of humans on earth. Who would want that result except a group of deceitful, murdering, lying, thieving criminals like the bush-cheney gang? And why? Possibly to destroy evidence of a history that is different from what we've been told. Certainly to destroy the history, the culture, the unifying bonds of the people in that country so they would be easier to enslave.


Now it's our turn. Our country has been targeted, invaded, is being taken over, our history erased and culture destroyed. It isn't a nation doing it -- it's a collection of the world's richest people, including some of our own. They operate in secret behind corporations, all working together through the World Trade Organization. But they are destroying our country and killing off our people as mercilessly as if they were distributing measles-infested free blankets to the kids.

Our nation, our democracy is being dismantled, as if termites were destroying the foundation of our homes. The politicians all take bribes and sell their votes, the public education system is being defunded and children are being shoved into cinderblock for-profit TV viewing rooms where they will learn to be boxboys (and girls) at Walmart and nothing else. The same corporations that have taken over Iraq and Afghanistan and slaughtered their people have taken our jobs to China and stolen our money. They have stolen all our money and given it to Wall Street, and now they claim they must cut back because the money has disappeared -- as if they weren't the ones who gave it away. I actually read someone today saying that people should not be eligible for social security until they're 70 -- but with the life expectancy going down, that just means you won't get it at all.

Rupert Murdoch owns the corporation that runs Fox and its related propaganda empire. Rupert and a Saudi prince own it, and they decide what information our nation should have, what lies to spread. They are erasing our history as we speak, lying about these wars, lying about all the thieves on Wall Street that have gotten away with the biggest theft in the history of the world. They lie, they breathe, all the same to them.

Our movies are garbage, and "art" is a collateralized asset bought and sold by Wall Street Scum just like they buy and sell people's lives. There is no inherent value in anything in this country anymore because the people who run the country destroy everything of beauty, every person with integrity, every idea that is original or creative. If they can't slap a barcode on it and sell it for an obscene price, it just does not exist. That includes people.

Our culture is being destroyed. That is a critical element. If you destroy the culture, there is nothing left to unify people or remind them of their common history. Instead of art, singers, musicians, composers, dancers, festivals, fairs, community events, local pride, regional and statewide recognition of accomplishments, we are left with guns, war and the flag.


Our culture glamorizes thieves, violence, guns, and young men who have been in war, men who steal and men who kill. Once again we are being told that we should read the books of young men who have been in war, vote for them to be our politicians and leaders, go see their movies, invest with them, buy insurance from them, trust them, follow them. I think we should not. I think our leaders in all fields should be only women, and only those who have never been in war.


As our treasury has been looted, and the rich have bribed the politicians to change the laws so they no longer have to pay taxes, the funding for our culture and arts has evaporated. Reading rooms for young writers, shuttered. Museums selling off assets because they can't afford to pay the air conditioning bills.

You go to bars around U.S. military bases in the third world and you find bar girls -- women who are prostitutes, hang around the bars and have sex with the military men for money. We recoil at pictures of them, thinking these are other people's young daughters whose lives are being destroyed. But our modern culture does much the same to our young women. Our entire media portrayal of American women makes them all Philippine bar girls.

Music is Lady Gaga, cheap tricks with cheap tricks. All women in the arts are sexualized, as are little girls in "beauty" contests, child trafficking in entertainment for pedophiles. TV is sex and violence and idiocy, and most of our radio has been taken over by the group that pushes the deaf drug addict as the new voice of America. Soon they will take over the internet so that when people try to search for information, they will only be taken to links provided by Rupert Murdoch's Whorehouse. Destroy the culture and you can destroy the people. That's what we've done in Iraq, and that's what our "leaders" are doing to us. That means it's almost complete. The End of a Nation.

What is the difference between child prostitution in third world countries and the way that the financial rulers force all young women in our popular culture to have breast implants, pose with lewd crotch shots, and simulate oral sex with various objects onstage. That's before they "sing," of course. You know what the real difference is? Ours get paid more. Other than that, in terms of destroying our culture, demeaning our people, cheapening our lives, no difference at all.


When it's over, I think they should rename the country. No longer the United States of America because our states are bankrupt and there will be nothing to unite us but shame. We should call it something corporate, like Principal Place of Business. Or, maybe World Trade Organization Headquarters. I like it: it's direct but catchy. I can see it on the T Shirts already. Now we need a new national hymn. How about that Coke song, but we could change the lyrics slightly: I'd like to teach the world to buy and borrow more money, I'd like to watch the nations die and Wall Street rule the earth. It's the real thing.....

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Corporate News: Brainwashing The World.

.


I was watching a TV show from Mexico last night, which purported to be some kind of current events or news show. The format, the style was disturbingly similar to many of the "news" programs we see in the U.S. I was struggling with the language, but that helped me to step back and see the big picture.

They had two women hosts with breast implants dressed in nightclub attire, and one male. A frenetic musical theme kept playing in the background suggesting climax: This Is It, Get Ready! Each host would frantically describe some event, then a video would be shown depicting the event, each more awful than the next.

First there was a young woman who almost fell to her certain death into a raging river, but was miraculously saved by firefighters, followed by the excited claim: "Extremo." Then they showed two young men fighting, one pulled a gun out to shoot the other but the gun malfunctioned, finally it worked and he shot the young man on the ground. "Extremo." Then another brief video showing drug dealers standing on a corner while the cops drive by, describing how the dealers rule the neighborhood. "Extremo."

It was so obvious (in another language) that the purpose was to desensitize the viewer, create a constant and false sense of danger and hysteria mixed with with sexual provocation, and essentially destroy the brain, create a terrified, over-sexed, hopeless people who will do as told.


Then I remembered that scene from the terrific Alan J. Pakula movie "The Parallax View." There was a secret militaristic mercenary organization that recruited sociopaths and trained them to be assassins. Warren Beatty goes underground to investigate the organization after its name comes up in association with the assassination of a popular American politician.

At the time of this movie, in 1974, it was hard to imagine our country would ever have private mercenary corporations on contract, but of course that's exactly the arrangement that bush-cheney had with blackwater, which the obama administration continues to employ. Very disgusting and scary to have our government having its own private mercenary group loyal only to those that pay it, with no duty or responsibility to the people of this country. If there ever is a coup, you can bet that private mercenary groups like Blackwater will be out in the streets terrorizing and shooting our citizens on behalf of whichever government has employed them. We need to demand the government stop hiring private corporate mercenaries, cancel all the contracts. If we need something done during war, we should give our military the resources and support they need to get the job done. Not pay hundreds of millions of dollars to CEOs who are only in it for the money.

In the movie "The Parallax View," the private mercenary contractor organization recruited people to become trained assasins to work for them. Part of the recruitment phase involved having the applicant sit and watch a movie while hooked up to electrodes to measure the response. The ideal applicant should be aroused at signs of violence and insensitive to the suffering of others. It's scary how similar this video is to what is shown on our TVs every night around the world.

This is what Fox and the other Corporate-owned "news" TV channels are doing in their programming. They are desensitizing people to the sight of violence and suffering, lawlessness, and military and police control, terrifying people, constantly throwing sexually arousing photos into the mix to further escalate the sense of arousal, and destroying people's brains and ability to focus.

We, the people, the citizens, own the air in this country, own the airways. The corporations bid for the right to use our airways to transmit their Tv programs. We used to have procedures for shows to require that they be relatively honest and truthful in their broadcasts. Those were the days when Walter Cronkite went onto TV every night and told the American people, to the best of his ability to do so, what had actually happened that day in the world that might be of interest to them. He told the public facts, and did not skew those facts to support any particular position or opinion. He certainly did not waste our time (and pollute our airways) by tales of half-naked females with breast implants, or rumors of which celebrity got caught with his pants down, or even report on the obscene self-indulgent greed of Wall Street scum who steal hundreds of millions from the public then throw it away on parties for their useless children. Walter Cronkite reported the news. Why don't we have more news on the "news" shows, and a lot less garbage?

I think we should cancel all the contracts. We used to have laws that prevented any one person or group from owning more than one TV station. When the stations were split apart, hundreds created where there used to be just a few, Rupert Murdoch wanted to take control of as many TV stations as possible so he could promote his fascist world view. He made a deal with that toad Newt Gingrich to change the law and let Murdoch buy up many stations across the country. That would be Fox, partly owned by a Saudi prince. So our "news" is now provided to us, all across the country, by some undoubtedly fanatic scumbucket from Saudi Arabia and the equally fanatic scumbucket from Australia, Rupert Murdoch. How is it possible that foreign interests control the information we receive in our homes at night? This is wrong.

We need to go back to strict controls on who gets to run programs on TV, including absolutely no foreign involvement or ownership, and nobody -- this means you Rupert -- gets more than one TV station, period. Return the stations to the people, let smaller groups buy them up, and give us real diversity or at least shut down this fascist propaganda that has infected our airways. Why should we turn our property, our airways, over to foreign interests, who will use their money and control to broadcast lies to our people? Can't we do better than that?

Demand the government bust up the monopolies, restrict ownership of and access to our airways to only U.S. businesses, and only one station per corporate or individual owners. Bust them up and stop these few people (i.e. Rupert Murdoch and the Saudis) from taking over our television airways and spreading lies, ignorance and propaganda to our people.