Only "Discretionary Income" Should Be Taxed Under A System Of
Progressive Taxation.
There is an economic concept known as "discretionary" income.
This refers to money that people earn which is above and beyond what they need
to pay for their basic living expenses.
For example, let's say someone earns $3000/month, $36,000/year. Let's
say further that the minimum it would cost this person for housing where they
live is $1200/month; health insurance $200/month; food $400/month; car
insurance, gas, amortized portion of purchase and repairs $250/month; other
utilities such as gas, electric, trash, phone, $150/month, dental $50/month,
clothing $50/month, personal products and cleaning supplies $100/month
(shampoo, toothpaste, toilet paper, paper towels), and $100/month for an
emergency fund. That means $2500/month is the minimum amount this person needs
to pay their basic living expenses, without any extras. That means this person
has $500/month, $6000/year in "discretionary" income.
Let's take another person earning $120,000/year, $10,000/month. Using
the same figures, this person would have $7500/month in
"discretionary" income. They could live reasonably on $2500/month,
and therefore can do what they want with the $7500/month additional income. It is
within their "discretion" to decide whether to save it or spend it
and, if they spend it, whether to buy something of long-term value or buy
expensive clothes that will have no value within two years. It is entirely
within their discretion.
One approach to a progressive system of taxation is to set up a basic
amount which is required for somebody to live reasonably every month. In this
scenario, I have assumed $2500 is the minimum cost to live reasonably in a
month. In a progressive tax system, the first $2500 of somebody's monthly
income should not be taxed because, by definition, $2500 is the minimum each
person needs to spend in order to have a reasonable life, to pay for the
reasonable necessities of shelter, food, medical and dental, modest clothing,
and transportation.
Assuming each person needs $2500/month for basic living expenses, that
amount should be deducted from their gross income before any taxes are owed.
The "standard" deduction from gross income, for purposes of
calculating taxes, should therefore be the minimum amount they need to
reasonably live: $2500/month, or
$30,000 per year for a single person. Obviously for married couples, and people
with children, each additional person in the family would "cost" less
than the $30,000 for the first person. The second person's "costs,"
in other words, might only be $20,000, since they share the cost of the
housing, utilities, and certain other expenses.
If the standard deduction was $30,000 for a single person, then anyone
earning $30,000 or less would pay no taxes. Which is how it should be if it
requires $30,000 for somebody to live with minimal standards. It's not the
fault of the citizens that the cost of living has gone up so dramatically. The
standard deduction, unfortunately, is frozen at some unreasonable figure which
doesn't even come close to representing what it really costs for somebody to
have a minimal lifestyle in this country.
Taxes should only be applied to discretionary income. The percentage of
taxes should be progressive, or progressive upwards to reflect the higher
income. For example, the first $10,000 of discretionary income might have a 10%
tax rate. Everything between $10,001 and $30,000 of discretionary income might
have a 20% tax rate. Everything between $30,001 and $70,000 would have a 30%
tax rate, and so on. All income (regular and capital gains combined) above the
amount of $250,000 should be taxed at 90%, at least until our nation has paid
for the bush-cheney wars, we have rebuilt our infrastructure, re-invested in
our schools and education, hired back the teachers, cops and firefighters, and
other public employee workers who have been fired, and put everyone back to
work. Somebody earning $550,000 for example, would be taxed a progressive rate
for everything above the minimum living standards, but would also be taxed at
90% of the $300,000 above $250,000.
So somebody earning $60,000 would pay $1,000 (10% of the first $10,000
of discretionary income, the amount between $30,000 and $40,000) plus $4,000
(20% of the amount between $40,001 and $60,000), for a total tax of
$5,000. The money that would be saved
by most working people would also be spent locally, in their own communities,
which creates jobs for our neighbors.
Sounds low? Only because we're used to having so much of the tax burden
transferred from the rich and the businesses to working Americans because of
the tax changes under Reagan and Bush. They changed the tax structure so that
the rich pay less, businesses pay almost nothing, and working people have to
pay more and more taxes because of tricks like not raising the standard
deduction to reflect the actual cost of living.
A progressive tax system, which we theoretically have,
"progresses," starting at a low tax rate for low incomes, and going
up to a high tax rate for higher incomes. What we have in our country is a
system in which rich people and businesses have paid so much money in bribes to
the politicians that our tax laws have been re-written so that everything is
now regressive, not progressive. Sales taxes, for example, are regressive.
Let's take a state sales tax of 10%, for example. The person earning
$24,000/year could easily spend 1/3 of that income buying items which are
subject to the sales tax, so they end up paying 10% of $8,000, or an additional
$800/year on sales taxes, let's say an additional 3% of their gross income is
paid out in taxes. But for the person earning $120,000/year, most of what they
do with their money is not subject to sales taxes, since much of the money is
"invested" in real estate, or other investments to which sales taxes
do not apply. So that person could end up spending under 1% of their income on
sales taxes. Sales taxes are regressive, since they force lower-income people
to pay a bigger percentage of their income in taxes, while the rich pay less.
The reason that more Americans are broke is not because we are stupid,
or even uneducated. There is a big push on now by the politicians and the
business community to claim that the reason we have high unemployment is
because we need to have more education for "our" workers so
"we" can compete. This is such garbage. A pack of lies. Tech
companies, for example, go to India and Pakistan and recruit computer engineers
to come to the U.S. and work on H1b visas, because they can pay them $11,000/year
less than they would pay an American. In the meantime, well-educated American
engineers in the computer as well as other fields have all been thrown out of
work by U.S. corporations simply because the CEO wants cheaper labor.
The same is true in the building trades, with many highly qualified and
well-trained Americans thrown out of work and replaced by truckloads of
unauthorized migrant workers brought into the country by coyotes.
Most major hospitals have an entire department devoted to getting h1b
visas and bringing in planeloads of nurses and similar medical workers from
countries like the Philippines, because they are paid much less than Americans
are. In the meantime, the community
college systems which used to turn out nurses with excellent two-year programs
now have five year waiting lists, so jobs that could be filled by Americans,
and Americans who are eager to do the work, are instead given to low-paid
foreign workers. This is the flip side
of outsourcing jobs. Nobody should be
allowed to hire foreign labor for a job inside this country unless and until we
have full employment for all Americans.
There is a systematic program in place in this country to throw more
people out of work, eliminate taxes and all regulations which otherwise apply
to businesses, cut the taxes for rich people, and steal everything that working
people have, including pensions, savings, and homes. All of it has been looted
and taken by the wealthiest and most powerful people in our country.
Another scam used by the rich to avoid paying taxes is the
"personal" charity. People
like Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Bill Clinton, set up their own personal
charities. Then they take part of their
income every year and put it into their "my charity" account, and
don't pay taxes on it. As long as they
pay out 5% of the money from the charity account to actual charitable purposes
every year, they do not pay taxes on the rest of the money. If you're earning 10% or more on your money,
you can see that this is little more than a scam to allow the rich to
accumulate large amounts of money tax-free.
What can they do with that money?
They use it to acquire interests in industries where they want some
control. Bill Gates, for example, has
used his charity money to buy into the field of Genetically Modified Organisms
(Frankenfood), to hold conferences on privatizing education so private
corporations seize our education money and create WalMart schools for the
kids. Every person should be limited to
a $500 tax deduction for charitable contributions. Pay your taxes to this country.
After that, if you billionaires are feeling a little generous, give some
of your money to the poor.
The tax system has been changed to allow the rich to pay less, and force
most Americans to pay more. Then the tax money that we do pay is taken away
from us, away from our communities, and sent instead to pay for wars, to
support dictatorships around the world, to pay thugs to stage coups and
overthrow other governments, while our schools and bridges and freeways are
allowed to deteriorate. Our country is
in a state of collapse because the rich no longer pay taxes, and the government
spends all our money on wars fought to benefit Wall Street and the corporations. You notice we don't invade countries unless
they have oil or other resources that U.S. corporations want to steal.
Changing the tax
system would be a good place to start in trying to save our economy. If we
started taxing the rich and businesses, we could begin the process of paying
down the debt and investing in our own country again.
